corneliasrum

Alla inlägg den 17 januari 2022

Av Ann-Christin Tjernström - 17 januari 2022 19:42

https://bakomkulisserna.biz/2022/01/16/nyheter-fran-den-internationella-common-law-domstolen-15-januari-2022-gmt-big-pharma-regering-kyrkledare-arrestas-nar-domstolen-overbevisar-dem-for-folkmord-forbjuder-injektioner/?fbclid=IwAR1UVymwOzqUuDOE7LXKeNFUgOw9XVlCzlVy3O7FplIcyown

JfQnoPiS4Zg


NYHETER FRÅN DEN INTERNATIONELLA COMMON LAW DOMSTOLEN, 15 JANUARI 2022 (GMT) BIG PHARMA, REGERING, KYRKLEDARE ARRESTERAS NÄR DOMSTOLEN ÖVERBEVISAR DEM FÖR FOLKMORD, FÖRBJUDER INJEKTIONER

Breaking News från International Common Law Court of Justice, 15 januari 2022 (GMT) Big Pharma, regering, kyrkoledare står inför arrestering när domstolen dömer dem för folkmord, förbjuder injektioner

Kevin Annett
January 14, 2022

http://murderbydecree.com/2022/01/14/breaking-news-from-the-international-common-law-court-of-justice-january-15-2022-gmt-big-pharma-government-church-leaders-face-arrest-as-court-convicts-them-of-genocide-prohibits-injections/#page-content

Global Breaking News, 15 januari 2022 (GMT) Big Pharma, myndigheter, kyrkoledare står inför arrestering när domstolen dömer dem för folkmord, förbjuder injektioner

VÄNLIGEN GÅ TILL VÅR TELEGRAMKANAL FÖR ATT SE VIDEON SOM TAGES NED: https://t.me/murderbydecree

Big Pharma, regeringsledare står inför arrestering när domstolen dömer dem för folkmord, förbjuder injektioner.

LÄNKEN NEDAN TILL RÄTTENS DOMSVIDEO SOM KAN DELAS MED ANDRA https://drive.google.com/file/d/16a-27tJZEYUptAzWMTZHoUx4n6JaJlUR/view

Killing Center: R.W Large Hospital i Bella Bella, B.C., Plats för mordiska drogtester och sterilisering av barn av katolska och förenade kyrkorna, Pfizer, Glaxo

Bryssel och Vancouver:

Den internationella domstolen som tvingade påven Benedictus från ämbetet 2013 har slagit ett slag mot covid-korporatokratin genom att döma topptjänstemän i Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Kina och Vatikanen för brott mot mänskligheten.

Domstolens dom dömer sjuttiofem individer till livstids fängelse, beslagtar deras tillgångar och avvecklar deras företag och förbjuder lagligen vidare tillverkning, försäljning eller användning av deras covid-vacciner som ”produkter av medicinskt folkmord och massmord”.

Efter en fyra månader lång rättegång som sammankallats enligt internationell rätt, utfärdade domarna i International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) sin historiska dom och dom idag, tillsammans med arresterings- och expropriationsorder mot de tilltalade.

De dömda personerna inkluderar Albert Bourla och Emma Walmsley, VD:arna för Pfizer och GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Xi Jinping, Kinas president, ”Påven” Francis (Jorge Bergoglio), ”Drottning” Elizabeth (Windsor) och Justin Trudeau, Kanadas premiärminister .

Enligt domstolens Public Affairs Office,

”Det här fallet involverar ett monstruöst brott mellan generationerna och dess lika massiva täckmantel. Kyrkans, statens och företagens högsta tjänstemän har i åratal personligen sanktionerat och gynnats av systematisk tortyr, människohandel och mord av barn i dödliga drogtester för att producera COVID-”vaccinet”, som en del av en kriminell konspiration för att minska mänskligheten till slaveri. Den konspirationen mördar oskyldiga, handlar med vapen, droger, barn och mänskliga organ och tystar eller förstör de som hotar att avslöja den.

”Vår domstol har satt ett rättsligt slut på den konspirationen genom att kriminalisera de ansvariga personerna och företagen och förbjuda vidare försäljning och användning av covid-”vaccinerna”, som är produkten av medicinskt folkmord och massmord på barn.”

Domstolens dom och dom kastar ett brett nät över de ansvariga genom att spåra rötterna till covid-regimen till det planerade folkmordet på ursprungsbefolkningen i Kanada av Vatikanen och Englands krona, inklusive i de mordiska ”indianska internatskolorna”.

Domstolen fastställer att de offentliga motståndarna till detta folkmord, särskilt Kevin Annett, ständigt har blivit utsatta för förstörelse av de dömda åtalade, som är ansvariga för mordet på femton aktivister och flera nyligen utförda försök mot Annetts liv.

”Våra beslut ger inte bara våra sheriffer och biträdande poliser, utan människor överallt befogenhet att verkställa domstolens dom genom att arrestera de dömda brottslingarna, beslagta deras tillgångar och stoppa försäljningen och användningen av de folkmordshärledda covid-”vaccinerna””, säger domstolen .

”Mördare av barn kan inte längre undvika rättvisa genom att använda verkställande eller företagsprivilegier, eller genom att gömma sig bakom kamouflaget av påhittade folkhälsokriser.”

Domstolshandlingarna bifogas detta meddelande.

En handlingsplan för polisens och medborgarnas deltagande i verkställigheten av denna historiska utlåtande och dom kommer att diskuteras i morgon, den 16 januari, på www.bbsradio.com/herewestand (kl. 15.00 Stillahavsområdet, 23.00 GMT).

Domstolens dom och beslut finns publicerade på http://www.murderbydecree.com under ”ITCCS-uppdateringar” och www.republicofkanata.ca under ”Breaking News”.

För att kontakta domstolen: itccsoffice@protonmail.com (attn: G. Dufort, Public Affairs Office)

Utfärdat lördagen den 15 januari 2022, kl. 12:01 (GMT) av International Common Law Court of Justice, Criminal Trial Division

Under beskydd av International Tribunal of Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) (inrättad enligt folklagen den 15 juni 2010)



Kategorier:HälsaMediaRättsstatVärldspolitik

Etiketter:

3 svar

  1. Hej, det är många idag som är förvirrade av denna nyhet och man försöker hitta domstolsreferens i officiella sammanhang men hittar inte. Och ITCCS sidan går inte att öppna. Det finns motstridig info på internet och jag vet att om folk går emot staten blir de föremål för motkampanjande. Har du haft kontakt med Kevin Annett om detta och vet mer av honom personligen? Det finns ett konto på Telefram murderbydecree https://t.me/murderbydecree/28 – de går ut med ny info hela tiden. Många ifrågasätter Brysselkopplingen och när man söker på detta hamnar man om referens internationella domstolen i Haag och ingen hittar doc referens om det där. Tacksam för svar bakomkulisserna om du gjort fler efterforskningar – det du delar här är annars den information som går att få fram på internet. Hr hittat Kevin Annett på Twitter: https://twitter.com/AnnettKevin

    Gilla

Av Ann-Christin Tjernström - 17 januari 2022 19:16

https://truthcomestolight.com/why-nobody-can-find-a-virus/


WHY NOBODY CAN FIND A VIRUS

HOME / BIG PHARMA / WHY NOBODY CAN FIND A VIRUS
Why Nobody Can Find a Virus

by Dr. Sam Bailey & Dr. Mark Bailey
January 5, 2022


Perhaps prior to 2020 the issue of virus isolation was of minimal interest to the vast majority earth’s inhabitants.  Most people blindly accept the medical establishment’s claims that viruses exist and can cause disease. They otherwise don’t give it a second thought.  Sometimes you get unwell, and a doctor informs you, “it’s probably a viral illness” – but almost every time, you get better again.

However, the increasingly negative impacts from government instigated policies in the name of the “corona” crisis has resulted in some healthy new interest in the subject.  Social cohesion in households and communities is being strained, businesses are being run into the ground, and suspicions about the requirement to be injected every four months to maintain protection against an invisible enemy are on the rise.  If no virus has been isolated then its very existence is pure speculation. A phantom menace that has no confirmed physical presence, merely a ruinous psychological construct manifesting as a living nightmare.  And those who ignore the pivotal issue of virus isolation are blindly accepting a premise on which all manner of lies can be built.

But there are scientific papers that prove isolation?…

The confusion surrounding virus isolation stems from the fact that many published scientific papers state in their titles or claim in their abstracts that they successfully “isolated” a virus.  In 2020 and 2021, we lost track of the number of times we were sent such papers as apparent proof of the “SARS-CoV-2” virus.  Similarly, industry-funded “fact-checking” sites have a propensity to link to such papers to reassure their spoon-fed readers that the “virus” has been isolated.  Unfortunately, such disinformation sites fail to inform their audience that the virologists are not referring to actual physical isolation of any virus and have instead substituted the meaning of the word isolation for something that means almost the opposite.

Researchers such as Christine Massey have tirelessly collated Freedom of Information requests from governments around the world to clearly expose the fact that the alleged causal agent of COVID-19 has never once been physically isolated.  While at least one government supported microbiologist has claimed this is disingenuous as the requests are worded in such a way that they are not consistent with the methodology of modern virology, this misses the whole point: the modern virologists are not isolating viruses in the way that the public and probably most of the medical profession are led to believe.  Instead, they moved the goalposts.

The excuses for this sleight of hand should be rejected and the isolation of a virus should mean the same as it does with any other entity on the planet – that is, in its pure form, separated out from other material.  It is done with things that are smaller than alleged viruses, such as proteins, and things that are bigger such as bacteria.  It is not a technological limitation or because of some special property that precludes this process from being essential to the process of real isolation.

The most definitive evidence of a virus would be finding it directly in a host such as a human.

However, despite the fact we are told that a single sneeze could contain 200 million SARS-CoV-2 particles, when we take a mucous or blood sample from a patient not one virus particle can be found.  And what about taking samples from hundreds or even thousands of people said to be infected and have a disease such as COVID-19 and then combining them altogether?  I’m not sure if this has ever been tried but apparently even then if we purified such a sample, the excuse is apparently the same: we wouldn’t find any viruses in there!  So, we are expected to believe that a patient is overwhelmed with trillions of viral particles but we can’t find any on or inside them.

Magic Tricks and the Electron Microscope

The virologists of old were convinced that with the advent of the electron micrograph and more efficient purification techniques they would be able to find all sorts of viruses in sick individuals.  However, it became apparent they would have to abandon this process around the middle of the 20th Century as the attempts were fruitless – no viruses were found.  These days when most virologists talk about isolating viruses, one of the techniques they cite is tissue culture experiments in test tubes.  It has been outlined why these are not only unsuitable proxies, but the stress of the test tube conditions alone on abnormal cells can produce the effects, no virus required.  Similarly, detecting genetic sequences in these culture experiments is also unsatisfactory as there is no proof that such sequences come from inside any of the particles they are calling “SARS-CoV-2” and even if they did, that this is enough to qualify them as viruses.  A virus is said to be a particle with a proteinaceous coat surrounding a genome that can infect and parasitise a host and then infect other hosts.

Therefore, anyone asserting that they have isolated a virus needs to show that what they have is actually a virus and not just test-tube observations and various biological molecules that can be detected without any viruses required.

How to Isolate a Virus

STEP 1: Identify a number of individuals with specific symptoms and signs that are thought to be caused by a virus.

This can’t be done with COVID-19 as it is an ethereal clinical disease that is “diagnosed” with a PCR result. There are no specific symptoms, signs or confirmatory investigations.  However, for the purposes of this essay we will assume that we are talking about a well-defined clinical disease.  We know that the virologists will not be able to find any viruses directly in a patient as outlined above, which doesn’t look good, but we’ll let them have another shot.

STEP 2: Perform a tissue culture experiment with a patient sample.

Briefly, this involves adding a crude sample (e.g. sputum) to some cells in a test tube and seeing if it produces any viruses. In early 2020 it was declared that a “virus” called SARS-CoV-2 had been “isolated” with this method.  In reality Na Zhu, et al, had both failed to physically isolate any particles or show any of these particles to be viruses.

So, what should have been done?  Na Zhu, et al should have repeated their experiment multiple times and then purified the particles they called “2019-nCoV” (later “SARS-CoV-2”) by means of a technique such as density gradient ultracentrifugation.  This technique was already well established in the 20th Century and as illustrated below in Figure 1 could be used satisfactorily to obtain much more purified samples that could be confirmed by electron microscopy.

At this point we could more confidently claim that we had physically isolated viral-like particles and could analyse their composition, including their genetic structure.  All very interesting (and beyond what has been done) but the proof that theses particles are viruses, that is infectious and disease-causing, still needs to be established.

STEP 3: Infect a live animal, eg a monkey with the purified particles.

Mind you, we are not talking about bogus experiments as described in Sam’s SARS-1 video.

Pouring large volumes of mixed tissue culture fluid directly into an animal’s lungs to see if it will cough or develop some lung tissue changes does not constitute evidence of a virus. Pouring any biological muck into an animal’s lungs will cause these reactions.  That’s why control experiments are suspiciously absent in such experiments.  The purified particles, said to be viruses (which we are told are airborne and highly infectious) alone could be simply sprayed into the animals’ cages and they should get sick.  Following that, any monkey introduced into the cage subsequently should also get sick if there is a contagious pathogen.

The Case for Human Experiments with “Viruses”

In fact, given that the world has been subjected to draconian restrictions, ruinous lockdowns, and population-wide experiments with “vaccines” in the name of an alleged virus, the case can be made for human experiments involving the “virus”.  In the tradition of Max von Pettenkofer (who swallowed cholera bacillus in 1892 to show that it could not cause cholera by itself), we would be happy to inhale any purified particles said to be the SARS-CoV-2 “virus”, like many (we’re sure) who have investigated virology.  It’s not particularly bold when one is aware that not once in history have any particles alleged to be viruses by themselves been shown to cause disease in any animal.  Of course, such experiments would not be considered ethical today because the “deadly virus” was declared to exist, cause disease, and transmit via aerosol even though no such evidence was produced.  However, one would suspect that these experiments are avoided due to the long history of the failure to demonstrate human to human transmission of any alleged viral illness.

Perhaps the complete lack of clinical evidence that influenza passes between humans as talked about below is the most embarrassing chapter for the “highly infectious virus” claimants. 

The virus model was suspect long ago but it’s a model that will continue to be peddled as it pays dividends for industry participants – indeed, the development of their playbook over the decades is outlined in Virus Mania.

The End of Virology

Forget hypothetical computer generated “genomes” from non-purified samples and PCR tests that are calibrated to these simulations: none of these require the existence of a virus.  Forget electron micrographs of cell “culture” experiments purporting to show viruses: these are simply vesicles of unknown significance until shown otherwise.  What we need to see is purification of these particles and then a demonstration that they can parasitise a host and are the causal agent of a disease.  The reality is that nobody is isolating viruses because carrying out the correct experiments would reveal that the particles are not viruses at all and virology would be finished.


Connect with Dr. Sam Bailey & Dr. Mark Bailey

cover image credit: based on creative commons work of mauriciodonascimento

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Posts under World News & Views come from assorted information sources around the web or from printed publications. The specific source will always be identified at the top of the post. Everything posted on this site is done in the spirit of conversation. Please do your own research and trust yourself when reading and giving consideration to anything that appears here or anywhere else.

 
 
 
Av Ann-Christin Tjernström - 17 januari 2022 15:05

https://rumble.com/vsnsqx-filmen-frn-canadian-covid-care-alliance-nu-med-svensk-speakerrst.html?fbclid=IwAR1_8ijXf9IngdBXMSzPHBmve_PTuc4uEj_R2rDlP-3at5P1jNkG


En sammanslutning av 500 oberoende kanadensiska läkare, forskare och sjukvårdspersonal har gjort en mycket informativ och pedagogisk film om effekten av P f i z e r s c o v i d v a c c i n efter sex månader. Den baseras på P f i z er s egna data, som delvis offentliggjorts. CCCA:s slutsats är att vaccinet aldrig borde ha lanserats, det var fler döda i v a c c i n gruppen än i kontrollgruppen.
Film
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good-2/
PDF
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good/

Presentation

Fråga mig

4 besvarade frågor

Kalender

Ti On To Fr
         
1
2
3
4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
<<< Januari 2022 >>>

Tidigare år

Sök i bloggen

Senaste inläggen

Kategorier

Arkiv

RSS

Besöksstatistik


Skapa flashcards