Alla inlägg under februari 2022
Of the two, only BlackRock has implemented a vaccine mandate, allowing vaccinated staff to return to the office in July 2021.Vanguard has not implemented a mandate, but offered a $1,000 incentive to its employees to encourage them to get vaccinated. Vaccine passport technology — another way BlackRock, Vanguard profit from vaccines BlackRock and Vanguard also are stakeholders in tech companies involved in the development of digital vaccine passports or “digital wallets” and technology that can track and allocate “personal carbon allowances.”
These companies include:
In turn, Mastercard is the fifth largest investor in Doconomy, a Swedish “FinTech” firm that is also heavily involved in the development of the DO Card.
Doconomy, in turn, collaborates with another Swedish “FinTech” firm, Klarna, in providing 90 million customers with “carbon footprint insights” based on their Doconomy transactions. While Klarna is privately held, its top investors include BlackRock and Visa.
After the U.S Supreme Court last month froze the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for large private employers, some companies — including Boeing, General Electric and Starbucks — dropped plans to implement the mandate.
Others, based on guidance issued in 2020 by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, left the mandates in place.
Most of the large employers that opted to mandate COVID vaccines for their employees, even though the Supreme Court ruled they didn’t have to, have something in common: BlackRock and The Vanguard Group have ownership stakes in them.
BlackRock and Vanguard, two of the world’s “Big Three” asset managers, also are among the top three shareholders of COVID vaccine makers Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson — which means the two investment giants stand to benefit from these companies’ soaring profits and the resulting rise in those companies’ stock prices.
BlackRock and Vanguard don’t just benefit from sales of COVID vaccines. As it turns out, they also have ownership stakes in technology companies developing vaccine passports and digital wallets.
Combined, BlackRock and Vanguard manage more than $15 trillion in global assets.
To put this figure into perspective, that amounts to more than three-fourths of the U.S gross domestic product (GDP) and more than triple the GDP of the European Union’s economic powerhouse, Germany.
BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with more than $9.5 trillion in assets as of July 2021, while Vanguard held more than $7 trillion in assets as of January 2021.
Notably, Vanguard is the largest stockholder in BlackRock (7.61%), while BlackRock is the biggest stockholder in Vanguard (13.06%) — though the actual ownership structure of these companies has been described as “dark.”
In an August 2021 article about the two firms, Dr. Joseph Mercola pointed out that, far from the appearance of competition promised by capitalism, BlackRock and Vanguard own significant shares in companies that ostensibly compete directly with each other, such as Google, Apple and Microsoft, or Coca-Cola and PepsiCo.
This influence extends to the media. BlackRock alone owns significant shares in supposed “competitors” such as Fox News, CBS, Comcast (NBC), CNN, Disney (ABC), Gannett (USA TODAY and 250 daily newspapers throughout the U.S.), Sinclair Media (whose television stations reach 72% of the American public), and the Graham Media Group (Slate, Foreign Policy).
BlackRock is also politically influential and well-connected, having been chosen by the Obama administration to buy up toxic assets following the 2007-2008 financial collapse.
In 2020, BlackRock received a no-bid contract from the U.S Treasury Department to manage a $454 billion fund, under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), for businesses adversely impacted by the COVID lockdowns early that year. It wasn’t the first time BlackRock had been granted a no-bid contract from the federal government.
BlackRock along with other firms also is engaged in a real estate purchasing spree, buying up entire neighborhoods of single-family homes and converting them to rentals, driving up home prices by reducing supply on the marketplace.
BlackRock’s real estate strategy echoes the words of the World Economic Forum: “You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy.”
This level of power and influence promoted none other than Bloomberg in 2020 to characterize BlackRock as the “fourth branch of government.”
It is unclear to what extent BlackRock and Vanguard are able to dictate the vaccination policies of the companies in which they hold a stake — but what is clear is that the two investment firms are among the top 10 stockholders in most of these companies.
Here’s a rundown of major U.S employers that continue to mandate COVID vaccines for their employers, and these companies’ relationships with BlackRock and/or Vanguard (all ownership figures are accurate as of this writing)
Forts. i nästa inlägg pga att texten inte får plats i detta inlägg.
https://rumble.com/vv380o-malmlistans-lkare-nils-littorin-tal-om-restriktionernas-avskaffande.html?fbclid=IwAR1fY9I37UcfVNGSltNLGIjzn1CsY4lbBhaoLMAen6jnRlsD
POMUeQB_oUQ
Nils Littorin är legitimerad läkare, doktor i mikrobiologi och aktiv politiker i Malmölistan.
Littorin menar i sitt tal att människor som arbetar inom vården och har förvärvat antikroppar diskriminerades under pandemin och att de tvingats att ta experimentella injektioner trots att de var immuna via en genomgången infektion. Ett förfarande från myndigheterna som han menar strider mot 2500 år av mänsklig erfarenhet av sjukdomar.
Han betonar vikten av att vi skyddar grundlagen och pekar ut Lena Hallengren (S) som den politiker som tyst vill smyga igenom ett beslut om att ändra grundlagen. Han kritiserar oppositionen för att vara obefintlig och osynlig i denna fråga och benämner nedstängningspolitiken efter inspiration av kommunistkina som aktoritär, ovetenskaplig och mördande.
Littorin menar att Sverige varit den friska kontrollgruppen i den globala pandemins masspsykos och berömmer statsepidemiolog Anders Tegnell för hans mod att påpeka brist på bevis för att nedstängningspolitik fungerar under 2020 men kritiserar samtidigt Tegnell för hans hållning under 2021.
Littorin kritiserar politikerna för att vara djupt inkompetenta som införde pandemilagen och som inte låter fria medborgare göra vad de vill med sina egna kroppar. Han kallar vaccinpassen för omänskliga och menar att genomföradet av denna åtgärd kraftigt skadat förtroendet för myndigheter för flera år framöver.
Han för fram att myndigheterna inte respekterar svenska folkets fria vilja och integritet och betonar att det är något allvarligt sjukt med vår värld när svårt sjuka människor nekas livsräddande vård för en sjukdom, samtidigt som naturligt immuniserade personer tvingas att genomgå medicinsk behandling.
I Jmm-intervju # 23 intervjuar jag Per Olhans vars mor gick bort efter tredje vaccinsprutan mot Covid-19. De två första sprutorna gick bra men efter den tredje kände Pers mor att något inte stod rätt till.
Hon började känna sig yr, snurrig, minnet blev sämre samt andra symptom. Sedan gick det snabbt och till slut var hon så dålig att hon blev inlagd på avdelning för dementa. Man tog provet på ryggmärgsvätskan och det framkom att hon hade fått Creutzfeldt-Jakobs sjukdom. 50 dagar efter sista sprutan avled hon.
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research
February 15, 2022
I have carefully read the Emergencies Act as well as the relevant sections of The Charter of Rights of Freedoms. I doubt Justin Trudeau has an understanding of the implications of his actions, not to mention his baseless accusations directed against Canada’s Freedom Convoy:
Were these allegations ratified by the House of Commons?
The nature of the Freedom Convoy is peaceful and non-violent.
See Global Research’s Video: The Protesters are Honest and Respectful
“V the Virus” is said to be responsible for the wave of bankruptcies and unemployment. That’s a lie. There is no causal relationship between the (microscopic) SARS-CoV-2 virus and economic variables.
We are dealing with a far-reaching and complex crisis which is sustained by a corrupt government, coupled with “fake science” and a relentless 24/7 fear campaign.
The government claims that the mandates are intended to “save lives”. Nonsense.
According to The Emergencies Act (1985) (Section 3 (a)
“a national emergency is an urgent and critical situation of a temporary nature that … seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians”.
The wording of Section 3 (a) of the Emergencies Act (quoted above, see also Appendix below) describes the chaotic political, social and economic and situation which has affected the lives of Canadians in the course of the last two years.
The corona crisis under the helm of a corrupt government is undermining the structures of civil society as well the democratic foundations of Canada as a Nation State.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
“protects those basic rights and freedoms of all Canadians that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a free and democratic country. It applies to all governments – federal, provincial and territorial.”
Those rights are being encroached upon by the Trudeau government.
Moreover, Trudeau’s decision to invoke a National Emergency is an encroachment on the jurisdiction of the provinces and territories as outlined in Section 3 (b) of the Emergencies Act (emphasis added):
“For the purposes of this Act, a national emergency an urgent and critical situation of a temporary nature that ….(b)
seriously threatens the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of Canada and that cannot be effectively dealt with under any other law of Canada. (emphasis added)
Selected excerpts
3 For the purposes of this Act, a national emergency is an urgent and critical situation of a temporary nature that
(a) seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians and is of such proportions or nature as to exceed the capacity or authority of a province to deal with it, or
(b) seriously threatens the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of Canada and that cannot be effectively dealt with under any other law of Canada.
4 Nothing in this Act shall be construed or applied so as to confer on the Governor in Council the power to make orders or regulations
(a) altering the provisions of this Act; or
(b) providing for the detention, imprisonment or internment of Canadian citizens or permanent residents within the meaning of subsection 2(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Må | Ti | On | To | Fr | Lö | Sö | |||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
5 |
6 |
||||
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 |
13 | |||
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | |||
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 |
|||
28 | |||||||||
|