corneliasrum

Alla inlägg den 12 oktober 2021

Av Ann-Christin Tjernström - 12 oktober 2021 19:44

https://truthcomestolight.com/viruses-cant-be-isolated-but-isolation-is-unnecessary-another-ridiculous-claim-from-those-who-insist-on-saying-sars-cov-2-exists/


Viruses Can’t Be Isolated, but Isolation Is Unnecessary”; Another Ridiculous Claim From Those Who Insist on Saying SARS-CoV-2 Exists

by Jon RappoportNo More Fake News
October 11, 2021


There are two types of virologists.

First, those who claim they’re isolating viruses. I’ve written many articles debunking their absurd stance. They define isolation as “swimming in a soup of many substances and never separated from the soup.” In other words, these virologists define isolated as un-isolated. You could call this Orwellian Scientific Newspeak. Sheer nonsense.

Then there are “the more sophisticated” virologists who say, “Viruses can only live in liquid inside a cell. Therefore, they can never be separated from the cell or the liquid. To demand isolation is to ask for the impossible. We can discover the genetic sequences of these viruses without isolating them. Forget isolation. Discovering the genetic sequences proves the viruses exist.”


Let’s examine this second brand of virology.

Let’s go back to the moment when scientists decided viruses existed for the first time. After all, THEY made the original claim. The burden of proof was on THEM. And they made that decision long before there was a procedure called genetic sequencing.


If isolation is impossible, if these viruses swim forever in liquid inside cells, un-isolated, then HOW DID SCIENTISTS FIRST DISCOVER VIRUSES EXIST?

On what basis did they make the claim?


Through direct observation? Certainly not, if the viruses can never be separated from the liquid in which they swim.

“We first discovered the existence of viruses that can’t be isolated by…”

By what? Singing songs? Talking to an ancestor of Antony Fauci? Finding out how much money was in the bank accounts of the Rockefeller family?


“No, look. Here’s the way it works. NOW we say isolation of viruses is impossible, because people are accusing us of not isolating them. But THEN, way back in time when scientists discovered the existence of viruses for the first time, they knew viruses HAD TO EXIST.”

“How did they know that?”


“Because all other explanations for why people were getting sick with certain diseases didn’t work, fell short.”

“I see. So there was only ONE other possibility. Viruses.”

“That’s right.”

“Do you realize what a ridiculous position that is?”

“No comment.”

And that’s really the end of the story. There was no “original discovery” of viruses. There was only an assumption backed up by nothing.


And NOW, when virologists claim they don’t need to isolate viruses because they can lay out their genetic sequences, another ridiculous situation arises. HOW DO YOU ANALYZE THE STRUCTURE OF SOMETHING YOU CAN’T ISOLATE?

How do you describe the structure of a thing when you don’t have the thing?

You DON’T describe the structure. You PRETEND you do.

You refer to other structures which themselves are only pretenses, and you pick out pieces of those pretended structures and you cobble them together, and you say, “Here it is. Here is the genetic sequence.”

This would be like a shop owner holding out his empty hand to the mafia thugs who showed up to collect their protection money for the week. The owner says, “Here’s your four hundred dollars. Can’t you see it?”

After a thug pulls out his gun, the store owner opens his wall safe and takes out strange bills and hands them over. The bills are pieces of money from the game called Monopoly. They’re pieces from American, French, German, Italian, Spanish Monopoly money, taped together.


And THAT’S called genetic sequencing of viruses. Funny money.

I’ll cover two more points. As Dr. Tom Cowan has stated, according to the conventional hypothesis of virus infection, viruses must be breaking out of cells and traveling to other cells. Otherwise, how can infection spread throughout the body? But this description assumes that viruses CAN live and thrive outside the liquid in cells.

Therefore, the claim that viruses can’t be isolated because they always live in liquid inside cells is false.

Which would bring us back to the first type of virologist, the one who says he IS isolating viruses—but can’t prove it, because his definition of isolation is, “swimming inside soup and never separated from the soup.”

And finally, what about electron microscope photos which purport to show isolated viruses? This is a subject fraught with conflict and misunderstanding. It is far from settled science. Many so-called viruses in these photos are cells that are “budding,” as if something has not yet, but is about to break out of the cell. Virologists will arbitrarily call these somethings viruses, without visual proof.


Then there are exosomes, “microvesicles released by cells in both physiological and pathological situations.” They are mistaken for viruses. There is other genetic material which can be misidentified as viruses.

People who wish to explore this thorny problem should read the works of Harold Hillman, a foremost critic of electron microscopy methods, who was exiled from the scientific community for his findings. Hillman once wrote: “Electron microscopists have ignored the dictates of solid geometry and most of the apparent structures they have detected are artefacts of their preparation procedures…” In other words, the techniques of electron microscopy create artificial entities which are then mistaken for natural entities.

Brian Martin, emeritus professor of social sciences at the University of Wollongong, Australia, writes, “In one case, Hillman gave a talk to a large audience at what he calls ‘a well known Welsh university’. The many undergraduates in the audience seemed sympathetic to his case. A lecturer stood up and claimed to have pictures from an electron microscope which showed that Hillman was wrong. After the talk, Hillman asked the lecturer to see the pictures. ‘I have not got any’, he said, laughing. ‘Why did you say you had in front of that large audience?’ ‘Because I did not want the students to be misled by you’.”


And that concludes today’s episode of Two Schools of Virology, Both Wrong, brought to you by NIH Paper Towels, the brand that mops up every spill but somehow never traps a virus.

Harold Hillman folder: click here.


Connect with Jon Rappoport


Av Ann-Christin Tjernström - 12 oktober 2021 12:51

https://rumble.com/vnlwi9-sources-vaxxed-delta-pilot-dies-in-flight-emergency-landing-required.html?fbclid=IwAR22eexWHr-h3dDjhVdI22IvWaS4DyroOxzusaG2BoEfE2b6E-4wpIQ4HNc


 

Sources: V A X X E D Delta Pilot DIES IN-FLIGHT, Emergency Landing Required

Published October 11, 2021 78,682 Views
 
 
  

Rumble — BREAKING! Multiple sources have reported a Vaxxed Delta Airlines pilot died IN-FLIGHT, shortly after receiving a second dose of the "Covid vaccine".

Dr. Zelenko Protocol: www.zStackProtocol.com

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Content, Become a Premium user: https://redvoicemedia.com/premium

Follow Stew on social media: http://evrl.ink/StewPeters

See all of Stew's content at https://StewPeters.TV

Watch full episodes here: https://redvoicemedia.net/stew-full-shows

Check out Stew's store: http://StewPeters.shop

Support our efforts to keep truth alive: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/support-red-voice-media/

Advertise with Red Voice Media: https://redvoicemedia.net/ads

Av Ann-Christin Tjernström - 12 oktober 2021 10:10


https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-airlines-cancel-thousands-flights-pilots-protest-covid-shots/


US airlines cancel thousands of flights as pilots protest forced COVID shots


Southwest Airlines cancelled nearly 2,000 flights over the weekend, amid reports of protests by pilots against new COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Featured Image

October 11, 2021, (LifeSiteNews) – It began with a trickle –– and then a flood –– of tweets on Sunday about Southwest Airline pilots calling in sick to protest their company’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, and then a cascade of reports that pilots from other airlines, as well as critical employees in other segments of the transportation industry, are preparing to follow suit.  

After Southwest pilots filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction against their company’s mandate, Southwest cancelled nearly 2,000 flights over the weekend, citing “bad weather.” While the airline and pilots’ union are dismissive of the reports of a pilot walkout, reports on Twitter and elsewhere have continued to emerge.   

‘The revolt begins’

“The revolt begins at Southwest Airlines,” announced Alex Berenson via his Substack, Unreported Truths.  “Pilots at Southwest appear to be sicking out in a rebellion against vaccine mandates that has crippled the airline since Friday.” 

“Why Southwest and not United?” asked Berenson.   

“Maybe because LUV is based in Dallas and has a 50-year-history of standing up to government overreach. On Friday the pilots’ union asked for a temporary halt to the mandate,” he explained. “The flight cancellations began almost immediately and are continuing today.” 

A Southwest pilot who wrote to Berenson explained why the pilots’ union is not publicly supportive of the ‘sick out’ reports:  

[T]he union cannot organize or even acknowledge the sickout, because doing so would make it an illegal job action. 

. . . 

But at the moment the pilots don’t even have to talk to each other about what they’re doing. The anger internally – not just among pilots but other Southwest workers – is enormous.   

. . .  

Telling pilots in particular to comply or face termination has backfired. 

“This pilot says he loves Southwest and finds the crisis painful but feels that if this is the only way Americans can stand up to these mandates, then let the chips fall,” concluded Berenson.  

“Way more to this Southwest thing,” tweeted Jack Posobiec, senior editor at Human Events. “Other airline crews are joining in.”  


Posobiec said in another tweet that Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s office has been “getting lit up” since Saturday night by transportation industry lobbyists and “even a few CEO’s.” “They want him to talk to [Biden] about mandates, per [White House] official,” Posobiec said. 


 


Av Ann-Christin Tjernström - 12 oktober 2021 10:05




https://swebbtv.se/w/gYzN8WUEiTAD62Y2qv9KWW?fbclid=IwAR1804sNkBKRUD4zSEMB1bRGo90Yl8PhpTMg0YEu8dC4tzbE
DPGeuNiJcPg

11/10 2021

 

Jesper Johansson gör här en intervju för Swebbtv med den tyska advokaten dr Reiner Fuellmich.

 

Fuellmich berättar att det inte finns någon grund för de åtgärder som genomförs med anledning av pandemin.

 

Det finns ingen grund för genomförande av vaccinationskampanjen. De så kallade vaccinerna har inte påstådd skyddseffekt utan är tvärtom farliga.

 

Pandemin har planerats i minst 10 år berättar han. PCR-testerna har varit genomförda så att de visat på Corona även för friska personer. PCR-testerna är inte konstruerade för denna typ av användning.

 

Testerna och Coronaåtgärderna har underkänts i ett flertal olika domstolar men politikerna har inte tagit intryck av detta. Orsaken är att många nyckelpersoner är mutade eller påverkade av de internationella finans-intressen som har iscensatt pandemin. Det framkommer också att professorer och doktorer som framträder som vaccinförespråkare har falska meriter.

 

Reiner avslutar med att berätta att många som har engagerat sig i denna fråga har förlorat gamla vänner men att det också knyts många nya vänskapsband.
-------------------

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 

Presentation

Fråga mig

4 besvarade frågor

Kalender

Ti On To Fr
        1 2
3
4 5 6 7
8
9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16
17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
<<< Oktober 2021 >>>

Tidigare år

Sök i bloggen

Senaste inläggen

Kategorier

Arkiv

RSS

Besöksstatistik


Ovido - Quiz & Flashcards