Videoklipp med professor Sucharit Bhakdi.

Då jag själv inte prenumererar på den här tidskriften, har jag kopierat och klistrat in en sammanfattning av den artikel som det berör.
Länk till artikeln finns i inlägget.

28 svenska läkare talar ut!!!

”En stor del av världens befolkning har nu haft covid-19 och ännu fler har någon form av immunitet. Därför bör vi bara vaccinera dem som är över 65 år eller i riskgrupp. Annars riskerar vi att upprepa de ödesdigra misstagen från vaccinationen mot svininfluensan” säger 28 svenska läkare i en artikel i Göteborgs-Posten.

”År 2009 vaccinerades 60 procent av den svenska befolkningen mot svininfluensan. Professor Hans Rosling kallade sjukdomen för en “mediahype” och immunologen Ann-Cathrin Engwall varnade för att massvaccinationen skulle kunna göra mer skada än nytta.”

”svenska barn och unga vuxna fick narkolepsi av vaccinet Pandemrix, som innehöll nya och i sammanhanget obeprövade beståndsdelar.”

”Ett par år senare drabbades Sverige och Norge, som massvaccinerat mot svininfluensan, betydligt hårdare av influensa än andra länder, vilket visade att skyddseffekten var temporär och att svininfluensaviruset hade utvecklats till ett säsongsvirus. Gör vi nu om samma misstag?”

”Låg dödlighet

Dödligheten vid covid-19 är i över 85 procent av fallen kopplad till en eller flera sjukdomar, och är utpräglat åldersrelaterad. I gruppen 90 till 99 år har 1 av 30 avlidit i befolkningen, i gruppen 70 till 79 år 1 av 420 och i gruppen 0 till 19 år 1 av 500 000.

Riskfaktorerna och den tydliga åldersgradienten bör även prägla åtgärderna.

Att massvaccinera en ung och frisk befolkning är inte medicinskt motiverat utan tvärtom förenat med risker som dödsfall, på grund av koagulationsrubbningar.

Vi bör vaccinera dem över 65 år samt även dem med identifierade riskfaktorer för död och allvarlig sjukdom. Individer med genomgången covid-19 har ett naturligt skydd och bör för närvarande ej vaccineras.”

”Sven Román, specialist i barn- och ungdomspsykiatri

Nils Littorin, ST-läkare i psykiatri, doktor i klinisk mikrobiologi

Sebastian Rushworth, AT-läkare

Ann-Cathrin Engwall, immunolog och virolog, doktor i molekylär cellbiologi med immunologisk inriktning

Ragnar Hultborn, specialist i onkologi, professor emeritus

Sture Blomberg, specialist i anestesi och intensivvård, docent

Ralf Sundberg, specialist i allmänkirurgi, docent i transplantationskirurgi

Lilian Weiss, specialist i allmänkirurgi, docent

Susanna Hartmann-Petersen, specialist i dermatologi, disputerad

Dinu Dusceac, specialist i kardiologi, disputerad

Anna Maria Wiedemann, specialist i allmänmedicin, disputerad

Boris Klanger, specialist i allmänmedicin, verksamhetschef

Olga Lundberg, specialist i allmän- och rehabmedicin

Ludwig Hellmundt, specialist i anestesi och smärtläkare

Robert Svartholm, specialist i allmänmedicin

Hans Zingmark, specialist i intern- och lungmedicin

Carina Ljungfelt, specialist i allmänmedicin

Christina Malm, specialist i allmänmedicin

Fritz Probst, specialist i allmänmedicin

Kristian Holmberg, specialist i allmänmedicin

Magnus Burling, specialist i allmänmedicin

Nina Yderberg, specialist i barn- och ungdomspsykiatri

Sven Meenen, specialist i allmänmedicin

Margareta Andersson, företagsläkare

Maria Papadopoulou, ögonspecialist

Ida Höglund, specialist i kirurgi

Hans Sjögren, specialist i anestesi och intensivvård

André Marx, ST-läkare i allmänmedicin”

Läs mer i artikeln:

https://www.gp.se/.../vaccinera-endast-riskgrupper-inte

 

 

 

Nobelpristagaren och kemisten, Kari Mullis berättar här om det test som han en gång skapade och som idag används för helt andra syften.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aISPlTLbJo

Detta klipp är nyare och lite längre. Kari Mullis avled hösten 2020.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSVy1b-RyVM

Nu delar jag åter ett recept från boken: Vegomejerier av Emelie Holm.
Den här ggn är det recept på havremjölk, och det är nog den billigaste och enklaste av de här vegoalternativer till dryck.

CIRKA 1 LITER

1.2 liter vatten

2½ dl havregryn
lite havssalt
½ tks vaniljpulver
1 krm malen kanel.

Lycka til!

 

Lyssna gärna på det här klippet där f d professorna Mike Yeadon intrevjuas:

Mike Yeadon Warns Vaccines May Be Deliberate Depopulation Ploy

Published on April 5, 2021

Written by lifesitenews.com

Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer, spoke with great urgency to America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) late last week warning that the drive to inject the largest possible portion of the population with experimental COVID-19 vaccines is “madness,” involves “evil,” includes “crimes against humanity” and may have the intention of “massive-scale depopulation.”

‘PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them…If someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world’s population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it. It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation‘, Dr Mike Yeadon told the American Frontline Doctors.

Yeadon’s comments are also made in the broader context of a sharp debate over theories offered by Geert Vanden Bossche, a vaccine expert associated with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who, with the appearance of a “whistleblower” has also warned of a “global catastrophe without equal” due to the way these vaccines have been utilized.

In short, Vanden Bossche fears these experimental vaccines, which do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus, will foster the development of “dangerous variants” that will be far more lethal to the unvaccinated and vaccinated alike, who, for different reasons, will not have sufficient immunity to protect them.

In addition to the immediate halting of the current vaccination campaign, Vanden Bossche’s proposed solution is yet another worldwide vaccination of a different type.

While Yeadon also fears terrible consequences due to these vaccination campaigns, he strongly disagrees with Vanden Bossche’s theory, and with the proposed solution of more vaccination.

“I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect,” Yeadon said. “There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.”

Last December, Yeadon, a British national, filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to immediately suspend testing on these experimental vaccines due to many safety concerns, including pathogenic priming, which involves “an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, ‘wild’ virus after vaccination.”

In their white paper on the topic, AFLDS warned that such reactions, which can be fatal, “are difficult to prove,” as they are often interpreted as infection with “a worse virus,” or, perhaps, a more dangerous variant.

Having maintained that there is “no need of vaccines” for COVID-19, Yeadon emphasizes below, “PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.”

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said:

“I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population. I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany. I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.”

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.”

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized. In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention. Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?”

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else. Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.”

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

INTERVIEWER: In a talk you gave four months ago, you said:

The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80 percent similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide.

The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they’re so similar; it’s cross immunity.

So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.

In other words, previous exposure to SARS – that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 – bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity.

The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures?

DR. YEADON:

“What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2. The study is from one of the best labs in their field.

“So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not ‘high throughout’ and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K

“However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits “for research” on scale, subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non-vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50percent of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25percent have been infected & are now immune.

“Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

Read the rest here: lifesitenews.com

Svensk översättning av Mike Yeadons uttalanden hämtat från humanistkunskap:

https://humanismkunskap.org/2021/05/01/pfizers-visselblasare/?fbclid=IwAR1WwlEu-Xb7KY0s8kAUsVo1O7X9RR2L0l3S1Uiq7wyUBzJikNmctELKmPM

Folkhälsomyndigheten går ut på sin sida och meddelar att PCR-testar inte kan skilja på virus.
Märkligt dock att de används på det sätt som det görs? 

"PCR-tekniken som används i test för att påvisa virus kan inte skilja på virus med förmåga att infektera celler och virus som oskadliggjorts av immunförsvaret och därför kan man inte använda dessa test för att avgöra om någon är smittsam eller inte. RNA från virus kan ofta påvisas i veckor (ibland månader) efter insjuknandet men innebär inte att man fortfarande är smittsam. Det finns också flera vetenskapliga studier som talar för att smittsamheten vid covid-19 är som störst i början av sjukdomsperioden."

Läs själv fortsättningen:
https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publicerat-material/publikationsarkiv/v/vagledning-om-kriterier-for-bedomning-av-smittfrihet-vid-covid-19/

Mike Yeadon, förskare:

I detta avsnitt av i serien "Modiga människor" intervjuas Ann-Chatrin Engvall som är immunolog, viriolog och har testat vacciner.

Hon berättar om sin bakgrund och egna erfarenheter i sitt arbete med att studera immunologi, virus och vaccin.

Klippet gick inte att klistra in. Dock väldigt bra och pedagogisk information och sök gärna själv på youtube.

MODIGA MÄNNISKOR AVSNITT 43. Ann-Chatrin Engvall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=nudUcyQOo78&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3cwSFRdOG2NEnkDLDAk1ePcgQneHdpCcMhKDYKeT10D7B5
EoK_4qCBxZM

Vad är intuition? Vet du vad intuition är och i så fall lyssnar du till den?
Är det när det gör ont i magen? Är det när du omedelbart känner att det där borde jag inte ha sagt, då det vrider om i magen? Är det när du med hela kroppen känner att något är fel? Går det att lyssna på sin intuition i den sitation som vi befinner oss i nu? Är det någon mening att försöka få andra att förstå den känsla som du försöker förmedla när du känner av din intuition?

Lyssna gärna till det här klippet med tankecoaching där det talas om:

• Var i din kraft.
• Var i ditt ljus.
• Lyssna på din intuition.
• Stå upp och gå din väg.